![]() ![]() 2 and 4 against the Hurricanes) in their 33 games. The Hawks, for example, had only encountered him twice (Feb. Once 100 per cent consensus is achieved, across the board, that each and every one of you agree on every single call or non call, only then will I concede that the rulebook is as clearly and neatly and easily interpreted as those who currently make that argument seem to believe. Nonetheless, Peel is just one of 43 referees the NHL has used this year. Likewise, it is fair for fans and media alike to ask that those calls or non-calls (the extremes, as it were) should be handled exactly the same manner, regardless of the score, regardless of the time of game, regardless of the zone of the infraction.īut to suggest that there does not exist a grey area is naive.Īll those who would argue this statement are welcomed to assemble, once the pandemic lifts, at a single venue, though in individual and separate rooms, all viewing the same exact clips, and then come to the conclusion of penalty or non-penalty. Let me offer the following: It certainly should be the goal of all of hockey to try and expand the scope of the two extremes of the spectrum, as outlined above, and try and really narrow down those calls that could go either way. No rewinding the tape to take a look at the slash over and over again in fine detail. Just to keep things simple, let’s assume we define the degree of aggressiveness by the speed at which the stick is travelling at the time it makes contact with an opponent. To me, the question seems simple enough: If you believe the rulebook is so easily interpreted, please explain to me exactly the point at which the swing of a stick crosses that threshold from non-aggressive to aggressive. They will point to the definition and suggest I would have to be an idiot not to understand the difference between a stick chop of which Paul Bunyan would be proud and a mere tap to the shins, as if these end-of-the-spectrum examples were the only times in which stick contact is ever made with an opponent. The NHL announced Wednesday that Tim Peels career as a league referee is over after he was picked up by a TV microphone saying he wanted to give the Nashville Predators a penalty, an incident that put the notion of make-up' calls squarely in the spotlight. ![]() The mere insertion of the idea of “non-aggressive stick contact” should strike fear in the heart of the call-the-rules brigade. Non-aggressive stick contact to the pant or front of the shin pads should not be penalized as slashing.” “Slashing is the act of a player swinging his stick at an opponent, whether contact is made or not. advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Referee Tim Peel no longer will be working NHL games now or in the future. Long-time NHL referee Tim Peel was caught on a live microphone during Tuesday’s game between the Nashville Predators and Detroit Red Wings admitting to calling a make-up penalty. He also worked the 2014 Sochi Olympic Games and the 2012 All-Star Game. There is no justification for his comments, no matter the context or his intention, and the National Hockey League will take any and all steps necessary to protect the integrity our game.”Īccording to an NHL ref bio page, the 53-year-old Peel worked 1,343 regular-season games and 90 playoff games as of February 1. “Tim Peel’s conduct is in direct contradiction to the adherence to that cornerstone principle that we demand of our officials and that our fans, players, coaches and all those associated with our game expect and deserve. “Nothing is more important than ensuring the integrity of our game,” the NHL VP of Hockey Operations Colin Campbell said in the league’s official statement. □□□Breaking News: The NHL is going to “Investigate” the “Hot Mic” incident in the #LGRW #Preds game where the ref was caught saying “there wasn’t much but I wanted to get a fucking penalty against Nashville” □ /0DD2lVwqsX ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |